The COVID pandemic popularized remote work arrangements; however, some managers claim that employees aren’t productive if not under surveillance, accelerating the adoption of “monitoring tools.” A survey launched by Real Research, an online survey app, attempted to gather opinions about the use of employee monitoring tools in the workplace.

Here are the key findings of the survey report:

  • 44.34% of respondents were fully aware of the increasing use of employee monitoring tools.
  • 41.83% of respondents agreed to the necessity of electronic employee monitoring tools.
  • 82.09% of respondents expressed some level of concern about the legal and ethical implications of electronic employee monitoring tools.

Monitoring Concerns in the Remote Workplace

Concerns about remote worker productivity have led to a rise in electronic monitoring and surveillance tools. While 44.34% of respondents were fully aware of the increasing use of employee monitoring tools, 37.85% were only vaguely aware, and 17.81% were completely unaware.

productivity-paranoia
Figure 1: Familiarity of respondents with the term “productivity paranoia”

“Productivity paranoia,” a term that describes managers’ concern that remote and hybrid workers aren’t doing enough when not under supervision, was also known to 73.57% of respondents (8.13% were very familiar, 18.8% were somewhat familiar, and 46.64% were slightly familiar).

Real Eyes: If Everyone Resists ‘Change’ Why Do Employees Look for New Jobs?

Tools vs. Trust: Divided Views on Monitoring for Remote Work

Despite the prevalence of productivity concerns, support for electronic employee monitoring tools remains low, with only 41.83% agreeing (9.36% strongly agreed and 32.47% somewhat agreed) to its necessity. Conversely, 21.49% and 36.68% strongly and somewhat disagreed, respectively.

need-for-monitoring-tools-in-the-workplace
Figure 2: Respondents’ stance on the need for monitoring tools in the workplace

Moreover, the majority (82.09%) of respondents expressed some concern, with 13.45% being very concerned, 31.33% somewhat concerned, and 37.31% slightly concerned, about the legal and ethical implications of electronic monitoring tools.

Read Also: 53.87% Get Job Security as Public Sector Employee Benefits

Crossing the Line: How Much Monitoring is Too Much?

To what extent do electronic monitoring tools infringe on employee privacy, particularly when working from home?

Notably, 44.04% believed that electronic employee monitoring tools only slightly infringe on an employee’s privacy when working from home. Meanwhile, 25.62% and 12.83% reported significant and complete infringement. In contrast,  17.51% claimed no infringement of privacy.

comfort-level-regarding-employers
Figure 3: Respondents’ comfort level regarding employers’ use of monitoring tools

Ultimately, 68.3% of respondents express discomfort, ranging from somewhat (42.28%) to very uncomfortable (26.02%), at the prospect of being monitored electronically. Others reported being comfortable (21.6%) and very comfortable (10.1%).

Methodology

Survey TitlePublic Opinion on Employers Using Tools to Monitor Employees
DurationOctober 26 – November 02, 2023
Number of Participants10,000
DemographicsMales and females, aged 21 to 99
Participating Countries Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, China (Hong Kong) China (Macao), China (Taiwan), Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Greanada, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Lithuania, Malaysia, Maldives, Maluritania, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar [Burma], Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zimbabwe.