The threat of nuclear war is one of the terrifying prospects humanity is facing today. With the recent news that Vladimir Putin is considering sending tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus, tensions between Russia and the West have once again ratcheted up to a generous level. As we grapple with the implications of this potential escalation, it’s crucial to comprehend the historical and political context that has led us to this point.

Risky Geopolitics Chess: Human Cost of Putin’s Nuclear Blackmail

Russia’s aggression toward its neighbors is nothing new—from the annexation of Crimea in 2014 to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine—Putin has consistently demonstrated a willingness to use military force to achieve his goals. The threat of nuclear blackmail against Ukraine and the Western powers is just the latest in a long line of aggressive acts to destabilize the region and assert Russia’s dominance.

But why is Putin so determined to maintain control over Ukraine and its neighbors? Some experts argue that it’s a matter of national pride and geopolitical strategy. Putin’s vision of resurgent Russia, free from the constraints of Western influence, requires the subjugation of neighboring states and the establishment of a new order in which Moscow is the dominant power. Others point to economic factors—with Russia seeking to control critical resources and strategic assets in the region.

Regardless of the motivations behind Putin’s actions, the potential repercussions of a nuclear conflict between Russia and the West are too horrific to contemplate. The use of even a single nuclear weapon could cause unimaginable destruction and loss of life, with ever-lasting effects on the environment and the global economy. The fact that Putin is even considering such a possibility is a chilling reminder of the fragility of our world and the need for responsible leadership at all levels of government.

Putin’s Nuclear Posturing is a Wake-Up Call for NATO

Russia’s determination to invade NATO member Ukraine and brandish nuclear weapons reaffirms the important role that nuclear weapons play in the security of the Alliance and its Allies, at least for the foreseeable future.

NATO’s Strategic Concept, released in June 2022, highlights the role of nuclear weapons in Allied deterrence. The document vaguely stated that the Allies would use an “appropriate mix.”

NATO does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to the Russian Federation. We will continue to respond to Russian threats and hostile actions in a united and responsible way.

The international security order is severely destabilized by Russia’s nuclear signaling and coercion. It is one of the significant difficulties NATO has encountered since the Cold War. We can, however, make some broad generalizations about Russia’s alleged use of coercion in Ukraine; yet, more study is required to back up these judgments.

The most effective deterrence device is still nuclear weapons. Although there was little dispute about this before the start of the conflict, it is important to reiterate, especially given that NATO is a nuclear alliance. Nuclear weapons, in comparison, seem to be a less effective means of coercion. Politically and diplomatically, NATO allies had no obligation to assist Ukraine in defending itself, but they nonetheless did so despite Russia’s nuclear rhetoric.

Hence, Real Research launched a survey on Putin’s nuclear threat to gather further insights and perceptions. Hurry and answer the survey on Putin’s nuclear threat on the Real Research app on April 2, 2023, and receive 60 TNCs as a reward.

Survey Details

Survey Title:
Survey on Putin’s Nuclear Threat

Target Number of Participants:
10,000 Users


Nationality: All
Age: 21-99
Gender: All
Resident Country: All
Marital Status: All
Language: All
KYC Level: All

Note: This survey is closed. You can view the results here – 53% Are Well Aware of Putin’s Nuclear Weapons Transfer.