Most STSS cases are caused by group A streptococcus (GAS), which typically causes fever and throat infections known as “strep throat,” in children. Rarely, strep A can become invasive, producing toxins in deep tissues and the bloodstream, leading to toxic shock. It can also cause “flesh-eating” necrotizing fasciitis, which can lead to loss of limbs.

With a mortality rate of 30% and the ability to turn deadly within 48 hours, the rise of flesh-eating bacterial infections in Japan has understandably caused public concern. To understand public perception of this deadly ‘flesh-eating bacteria’ outbreak, Real Research, an online survey app, conducted a survey to gauge public awareness and concerns.

Key Findings:

• Almost everyone surveyed (73%) is worried about STSS because the infection can turn deadly within 48 hours.
• While the health ministry advises against them, the majority (70%) wanted restrictions to prevent the spread of STSS.
• Experts say STSS is unlikely to become a pandemic – over 60% agree it wouldn’t be widespread like COVID.

How aware are people of the outbreak?

The survey revealed that nearly two-thirds of respondents were aware of the rise in flesh-eating bacterial infections in Japan. This awareness is further emphasized by the fact that over 80% (60.14% very familiar + 24.74% somewhat familiar) reported some level of familiarity with STSS itself.

How worried are people about this illness?

STSS is alarming due to its rapid progression. Many die within 48 hours of infection, leaving little time for treatment. “Out of 10 people with STSS, as many as three people will die from the infection,” the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. This rapid progression and high mortality rate of STSS are alarming to a vast majority (73.08%).

Should there be travel restrictions in Japan?

Interestingly, despite the outbreak being centered in Japan, there’s a prevailing concern about international spread through travel. While the Japanese health ministry advises against travel restrictions (which 29.06% agreed with), a large majority (70.94%) believed such measures were necessary to curb the spread of flesh-eating bacterial infections in Japan.

Can STSS become a pandemic like COVID-19?

Nonetheless, STSS is not a respiratory illness like pneumonia or COVID-19, so it is unlikely to lead to a pandemic, said Dr Hitoshi Honda, an infectious disease professor at Fujita Health University. The disease is primarily transmitted through nasal or throat mucosa droplets and via contact with wounds.

This was reflected in the survey results, with 62.26% agreeing that STSS wouldn’t become a widespread outbreak like COVID-19.

What caused the outbreak in Japan?

The survey also explored potential reasons for the STSS outbreak in Japan.  A plurality (42.82%) believed increased stress and mental health issues were the primary culprit, followed by those attributing it to weakened immune systems post-COVID (39.18%). 5.72% pointed to lifestyle and dietary changes during the pandemic.

Finally, the survey on the rise of flesh-eating bacterial infections in Japan addressed public confidence in the Japanese government’s handling of the outbreak. Disappointingly, over half (53.72%) of respondents felt the government wasn’t adequately addressing the STSS outbreak.

The post Deadly in 48 Hours? No Wonder 3 in 4 People Fear Japan’s Flesh-Eating Bacteria! appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

Real Research, an online survey app, sought to gauge public opinion on these proposed changes. The survey revealed a majority of respondents, 64.5%, were aware of the Senate bill proposing adding women to the US military draft.

Key Findings:

• There’s more support (56.93%) for drafting women than against (43.07%).
• Even more people (70.87%) like the idea of automatic registration for everyone.
• A majority (60.17%) think the current system, where only men register, is unfair.

Is there support for drafting women?

Not everyone in Congress, particularly conservative Republicans, is on board with the proposal to have women register for the draft. Meanwhile, a majority of the surveyed respondents (56.93%) expressed support for the proposal.

However, the issue isn’t without its detractors. While the idea of adding women to the US military draft garnered support, there remains a significant minority (43.07%) opposed to it.

Read Also: 57% Think U.S. Military Presence in Afghanistan Would Prevent Taliban Resurgence

Is automatic registration a better option?

In addition to expanding the registration requirement to women, the bill also contained a bipartisan proposal that would make registering for the draft automatic. Interestingly, the idea of automatic draft registration received even stronger backing, with a resounding 70.87% favoring this approach, compared to just 29.13% who prefer the current voluntary system.

The impetus for these changes appears clear. The current system, which only requires men aged 18-25 to register, is seen as unfair by a majority (60.17%).

Furthermore, the significant shortfall in military recruitment (roughly 41,000 in 2023) fuels the belief (68.23%) that adding women to the US military draft could have a positive impact on enlistment numbers.

Read Also: Youth Enlist in the Military Out of Sense of Duty to Serve, Say 13%

Will this bill turn into a law?

In 2020, a panel of military experts advised Congress that adding women to the US military draft would serve national security. Congress has repeatedly considered proposals to make the change, but none have become law.

Despite the public’s apparent openness to including women and automating registration, skepticism remains. Only 63.73% believe the bill proposing adding women to the US military draft will actually become law.

Are young Americans ready?

A lingering concern with any potential draft revolves around the preparedness of young Americans. While not an overwhelming majority, over half (58.53%) expressed confidence that the current generation could answer the call if necessary.

The post 60.17% Say Only Men Registering for the Draft Isn’t Right: 57% Say Add Women! appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

This harrowing statistic has sparked public concern over the safety measures implemented to protect Hajj pilgrims. Real Research, an online survey app, conducted a survey to gauge public awareness and sentiment regarding these heat-related deaths among Hajj pilgrims.

Key Findings:

• Over 70% of respondents were aware of the heat-related deaths of Hajj pilgrims this year.
• Stricter regulations on unregistered pilgrims were the top suggestion for protecting pilgrims from extreme heat.
• 73.48% support capping the number of pilgrims to reduce overcrowding.

Deaths During Hajj

Public awareness seems high, with over 70% of respondents acknowledging the heat-related deaths among Hajj pilgrims this year.

When asked if the Saudi authorities could have done more to prevent these heat-related deaths among Hajj pilgrims, a majority (79.5%) responded with “Absolutely” (31.7%) or “Possibly” (47.8%).

Protecting Pilgrims from the Heat

The survey also asked respondents to suggest specific measures to protect pilgrims from extreme heat better. Stricter regulations on unregistered pilgrims (29.42%) emerged as the top suggestion followed by improved access to water (26.12%), increased shaded areas (25.08%), and increased ventilation in crowded areas (19.38%).

Looking beyond heat-related deaths among Hajj pilgrims, the survey also delved into crowd management and medical preparedness. Respondents called for better crowd control strategies (35.8%), improved medical facilities (29.3%), and stricter adherence to official Hajj visa procedures (34.9%).

Capping the Crowd

The survey then assessed the public’s perception of current safety measures. While a combined 57.4% found the measures adequate or very adequate, 42.6% felt they were inadequate or very inadequate.

Finally, the survey tackles the sensitive topic of limiting pilgrim numbers. A resounding 73.48% support a cap on the maximum number of pilgrims to prevent overcrowding. This, coupled with stricter regulations and improved infrastructure, could significantly reduce the risk of heat-related deaths among Hajj pilgrims in the future.

The post 73% Want Caps on Pilgrims After Hajj Heatstroke Tragedy appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

Recently, the Biden administration has announced sweeping immigration reforms that offer undocumented spouses of American citizens and their children a clear pathway to legal status and eventual citizenship. This contrasts sharply with former President Donald Trump’s strict, anti-immigration stance, aiming to unify families and strengthen the economy.

With the widespread debate and public interest surrounding President Biden’s immigration reforms, Real Research, an online survey app, conducted a survey to capture a snapshot of public sentiment. The survey aimed to understand public awareness, support, and perceptions regarding the economic and social impacts of these reforms.

Key Findings:

• 61.12% believed that Biden’s reforms could lead to an increase in illegal immigration.
• 54.34% preferred Biden’s stance, and 45.66% favored Trump’s tougher measures.
• 41.52% believed Biden’s immigration reforms would significantly help his chances in the 2024 presidential election.

Are people aware of Biden’s immigration reforms?

The survey first asked respondents if they were aware of Biden’s immigration reforms. A significant majority, 64.94%, reported being aware of the reforms, while 35.06% were not.

When asked about their stance on Biden’s immigration reforms, 59.52% expressed support, whereas 40.48% opposed them.

Do people think Biden’s reforms could lead to more illegal immigration?

Despite support for the reforms, concerns about potential drawbacks were also evident. A majority, 61.12%, believed that Biden’s new immigration plan could lead to an increase in illegal immigration.

The concern resonates with the criticisms from the Trump campaign, which labeled the policy as a “mass amnesty plan” that might invite more illegal immigration and potentially increase migrant crime.

Nonetheless, addressing the balance between family unity and border security, 63.6% felt that Biden’s immigration reforms strike the right balance. Despite Trump’s criticism, President Biden said he refused to believe that an embrace of immigration would compromise the US’s border security.

How do people view Biden’s approach compared to Trump’s?

Biden’s approach contrasts sharply with former President Donald Trump’s hardline stance on immigration, including mass deportations and strict border policies.

When comparing Biden’s approach to Trump’s, the survey revealed a divided public opinion. While 54.34% preferred Biden’s more inclusive and compassionate stance on immigration, 45.66% favored Trump’s stricter policies.

Do people believe Biden’s reforms will boost the U.S. economy?

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “These [Biden’s immigration reforms] measures will help keep American families together and allow more young people to contribute to our economy and our country.” This statement aligns with the perspective of 65.36% who believed that these reforms would boost the U.S. economy. On the other hand, 34.64% did not share this optimism.

How might Biden’s reforms affect his chances in the 2024 election?

As the 2024 US presidential election approaches, these immigration reforms are expected to play a pivotal role. Survey responses suggest a mixed impact on Biden’s electoral prospects.

While 41.52% believe the reforms will significantly help his chances, 44.12% think they will only somewhat help. Only a small fraction, 4.04%, feel the reforms will significantly hurt his chances.

The post Over 85% Say Biden’s Reforms Could Help Him Win the 2024 Presidential Election appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

While the sale of cannabis remains illegal, with medical use as the only exception, this development has sparked a national conversation. To gauge public opinion, Real Research, an online survey app, conducted a survey to understand public perspectives on South Africa legalizing cannabis.

Key Findings:

• The public is pretty much 50/50 for and against South Africa’s legalization of cannabis for personal use.
• Almost 60% agree past cannabis offenses should be cleared.
• Nearly 58% think taking it slow on weed shops is a good call for managing any risks.

South Africa Legalizes Marijuana for Personal Use

In South Africa, President Cyril Ramaphosa signed the ‘Cannabis for Private Purposes Act,’ legalizing marijuana for personal use and finally removing cannabis from the country’s list of outlawed narcotics. The legalization of marijuana in South Africa regulates how adults can cultivate, possess, and consume cannabis for personal use.

The survey revealed a population that’s both informed and divided on South Africa legalizing cannabis. While the majority (63.42%) were aware of the new law, the rest (36.58%) remained uninformed.

When asked about their stance, the results were nearly split down the middle. South Africa legalizing cannabis garnered support from 50.72% of respondents, while 49.28% opposed it.

Buying Weed is Still a No-Go

Despite legalizing marijuana for personal use, the sale of cannabis and the creation of a legal market remain prohibited, unless for medicinal purposes. There is currently no lawful way to acquire cannabis for recreational use except by growing it yourself.

A policy analyst believes South Africa’s cautious approach to commercial cannabis sales might help it avoid a situation like Thailand’s, where lawmakers are now threatening a U-turn to its cannabis use due to rising public health concerns.

Although 58.24% believe South Africa should consider legalizing the commercial sale of marijuana, another 57.96% believe South Africa’s cautious approach to commercial sales will be effective in managing potential risks.

Clean Slate for Past Potheads?

The expungement of prior marijuana-related convictions also received broad backing, with 58.54% believing it’s a necessary step in South Africa legalizing cannabis. Apparently, the bill also stipulates that those who committed cannabis-related offenses before the legalization of marijuana should have their records automatically wiped clean.

Are the Rules Fair or a Buzzkill?

However, opinions diverged regarding the regulations. As per the law, public consumption, failing to ensure cannabis plants are inaccessible to children, exceeding cultivation and possession limits, or not complying with cultivation standards will result in penalties, including fines and imprisonment.

While nearly 40% found the regulations regarding cannabis use in South Africa appropriate, others felt they were either too strict (21.94%) or lenient (38.14%). Nonetheless, over 61% of respondents believe South Africa legalizing cannabis could be a trendsetter for the rest of Africa.

The post South Africa’s Cannabis Law: 50% For, 50% Against appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

However, recent research shows that even plant-based foods, particularly when they’re ultra-processed, might contribute to chronic diseases. This is a stark contrast to the common perception that “plant-based equals healthy.”

This intriguing shift prompted Real Research, an online survey app, to delve deeper into consumer awareness and perspectives on this topic.

Key Findings:

• Despite the awareness regarding the study on plant-based foods linked to chronic diseases, most people still consume plant-based foods.
• Over 60% agree that a plant-based diet doesn’t always equal a healthy diet.
• 9 in 10 show interest in switching to fresh or minimally processed plant-based options.

Are plant-based foods linked to chronic diseases?

The survey revealed that 67.12% of respondents were aware of the emerging research on ultra-processed, plant-based foods linked to chronic diseases. Interestingly, despite this newfound awareness, plant-based options remain popular, with 68.96% reporting consuming plant-based foods.

Is plant-based food healthy?

Further aligning with the concept of plant-based foods linked to chronic diseases, a majority (64.68%) agreed with UK dietician Duane Mellor’s statement that a plant-based diet doesn’t always equal a healthy diet. Sugar, for example, is a prime illustration – it’s plant-based but hardly health-promoting.

Read Also: 31.83% of the Respondents are Dietary Vegans – Survey Results

Do plant-based burgers need a warning label?

The survey also shed light on the marketing of plant-based products. Over half (55.52%) felt food manufacturers do not adequately highlight the health risks associated with ultra-processed, plant-based foods linked to chronic diseases.

Furthermore, a strong majority (89.5%) – combining those who answered “absolutely” and “somewhat” – believe manufacturers should do more to educate consumers on this issue.

Who wants more plants on their plate?

The good news? There’s a strong willingness to shift towards healthier choices. When presented with the possibility of replacing ultra-processed options with fresh or minimally processed plant-based foods, a staggering 91% (combining “highly likely” and “somewhat likely” responses) expressed interest in making this switch.

The post Confusion Over Plant-based Food and Chronic Disease: 90% Want Clearer Labels! appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

However, the EU’s decision is fraught with concerns about possible Chinese retaliation and strained trade relations. Hence, Real Research, an online survey app, delves into the anxieties surrounding the rise of cheap Chinese EVs.

Key Findings:

• Two-thirds liked the idea of tariffs on these Chinese EVs to even the odds for European manufacturers.
• While over half thought the proposed 38% was good, 43% wanted an even higher tariff.
• Not everyone thought tariffs were the best answer. A quarter thought Europe should focus on strengthening its own car industry instead.

Is China’s EV Industry a Threat to the EU?

According to a press release, “The Commission has provisionally concluded that the battery electric vehicles (BEV) value chain in China benefits from unfair subsidization, which is causing a threat of economic injury to EU BEV producers.” This has led the EU to propose tariffs as high as 38% on imports of cheap Chinese EVs.

These tariffs, expected to bring in over €2 billion annually, aim to level the playing field for European car manufacturers. This decision is intended to enable European manufacturers to compete fairly against their Chinese counterparts.

As per the survey findings, 72% of respondents were already aware of cheap Chinese EVs threatening other car industries. Furthermore, 66.66% endorse the EU’s plan to impose tariffs, viewing it as an effective way to protect domestic European car manufacturers and ensure fair competition.

Public Back Tariffs, But at What Cost?

Despite supporting tariffs, there’s a split on the ideal rate. While over half (56.82%) find 38% sufficient, 43.18% believe a higher tariff is necessary,

But while some debate on how much tariffs should be imposed, others argue whether tariffs are the most effective solution. Although 22% insisted on imposing tariffs on cheap Chinese EVs, the rest suggested alternatives such as strengthening European industrial policy (25.82%), negotiating trade agreements with China (26%), or offering subsidies to European car manufacturers (26.18%).

Can China and the EU Find Common Ground?

The impact of the EU’s plan to impose tariffs on Chinese EVs might not be one-sided though. European automakers themselves are keen on accessing China’s vast auto market and forging partnerships in the EV sector to reduce their own costs. Still, a slight majority (50.62%) believe Chinese EV makers will be more negatively affected by the EU’s tariff proposal than European automakers.

Recently, top officials from both regions spoke about the tariffs and have agreed to negotiate. In light of this, 66.2% believe negotiations between China and the EU can lead to a mutually beneficial outcome.

The post Over Half Want European Tariffs on Cheap Chinese EVs, But Is 38% Enough? appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

The announcement marks Apple’s entry into the AI race, previously dominated by competitors like Google and Microsoft. However, Apple’s integration of ChatGPT has also sparked concerns about privacy and security, prompting Real Research, an online survey app, to conduct a survey to gauge public opinion on this bold move.

Key Findings:

• Most people heard about Apple adding ChatGPT to iPhones, but opinions are split. Over 60% are cool with it and almost 40% aren’t.
• 65% have security concerns about their data, but almost everyone (94%) trusts Apple’s promises to keep it safe.
• Only a quarter are more likely to buy Apple products now, while over half are actually less likely.

Is Everyone Down With ChatGPT on iPhones?

The announcement of OpenAI’s integration into Apple devices was heard by almost 70% of the surveyed respondents. But while over 60% supported Apple’s integration of ChatGPT, almost 40% expressed opposition.

Security Worries Echo Musk’s Concerns

The division likely stems from concerns echoed by the owner of Tesla and Twitter/X, Elon Musk. Musk expressed strong criticism of Apple’s partnership with OpenAI, threatening to ban iPhones from his companies due to data security concerns. The survey found that these concerns resonated with the majority (64.58%) of respondents.

Despite these worries, 94.18% expressed varying levels of confidence in Apple’s assurances on data security. Apple emphasizes the security and privacy of its AI integration, highlighting that processing will occur on devices with no data stored in the cloud. However, 5.82% remained unconvinced.

Groundbreaking or Just Playing Catch-Up?

The survey also captured the competitive landscape. With over 66% agreeing with Samsung’s jibe that Apple’s integration of ChatGPT wasn’t groundbreaking, it seems some users perceive Apple’s move as catching up with the AI race rather than groundbreaking innovation. Yet, over 62% believe Apple’s pace of adopting AI technology is sufficient to compete.

Will This Make You Buy an iPhone?

However, the newfound optimism doesn’t necessarily translate to sales. While a quarter of respondents are more likely to purchase Apple products due to Apple’s integration of ChatGPT, a much larger portion (over 56%) expressed a decreased purchase intent. Meanwhile, loyal Apple users (around 9%) and non-Apple users (around 10%) remain unaffected.

The post 66% Back Samsung’s Claim That Apple’s ChatGPT Integration Isn’t Groundbreaking appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

Real Research, an online survey app, revealed that 65% of the respondents were aware that four US college instructors were stabbed in China, and 35% were unaware.

Highlights:

• 71.84% of respondents think the incident will likely impact educational exchanges between the US and China.
• The US State Department’s travel advisory for China is justified, according to 84.6% of respondents.
• Over two-thirds said their perception of safety in China has been affected.

News and Media Reports

News of the incident was suppressed within China, with media outlets not reporting it. Social Media posts were quickly removed, and a related hashtag was blocked. 53% of respondents think the suppression of news and social media posts regarding this incident in China is justified, while 45% believe otherwise.

Impact on Educational Exchanges Between the US and China

Nearly 72% of respondents (possibly, 47.7% + definitely, 24.14%) believe that the stabbing in China is likely to impact educational exchanges between the two countries. 28% believe otherwise.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said that, upon preliminary assessment, police believed the attack in Jilin City’s Beishan Park was an isolated incident and that the investigation is ongoing.

Considering the tension between the US and China, 57% of respondents believe the statement mentioned above is credible, and 43% oppose this belief.

US State Department Travel Advisory

China’s President plans to invite 50,000 young Americans to China to enhance bilateral exchanges, especially among youth. However, a US State Department travel advisory warns Americans about arbitrary detentions and exit bans, urging caution when traveling to mainland China.

In response, nearly 85% of respondents (60% highly justified + 24.6% justified) believe the US State Department’s travel advisory for China is justified, given that four US college

instructors were stabbed in China. Meanwhile, 13% hold a neutral stance, and only 3% find the advisory unjustified (1.6% unjustified + 1% highly unjustified).

Safety in China

58% of respondents think the media adequately covers safety incidents involving foreigners in China, while 42% oppose this belief.

Survey on Four US College Instructors Stabbed in China

Finally, 68% of respondents said their perception of safety in the country would be affected because four US college instructors were stabbed in China, while 32% do not share this view.

The post 85% Support US Travel Advisory for China After Stabbing Incident appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.

Real Research, an online survey app, revealed that 65% of respondents were aware that three had been sentenced to eight months in jail for the racial abuse of Real Madrid star Vinicius Junior, and 35% were unaware.

Highlights:

• 81.9% support the eight-month prison sentence and stadium ban for the three fans guilty of racially abusing Vinicius Jr.
• 8/10  agree with Vinicius’ statement that he is not a victim of racism but a tormentor of racists.
• 6 out of 10 are satisfied with how the Spanish Football Federation and La Liga have handled the racial abuse incident involving Real Madrid star Vinicius.

Racial Abuse of Real Madrid Star

Nearly 82% of respondents (agree, 56.56% + strongly agree, 25.42%) agree with the eight-month prison sentence and stadium ban given to the three fans found guilty of racially abusing Viniciuis Jr. However, 16% of respondents disagree with the eight-month prison sentence, and 2% strongly disagree.

Vinicius Junior’s Opinion on the Sentence

Vinicius Jr. made a powerful statement on X, declaring, “I am not a victim of racism; I am a tormentor of racists. This first criminal conviction in Spain’s history is not for me but for all black people.” His stance resonates strongly with the public, as 81.48% of respondents support his approach (44.62% strongly support, 36.86% support), while 15% remain neutral.

However, a small percentage disagrees with his stance, with 2% strongly opposing and 1% completely opposing his position.

Read Also: 64% Of Respondents Favor the Decision to Permanently Ban the Fans That Racially Abused Vinicius

Racial Abuse Targeted at Vincius Jr

69% of respondents are satisfied with how the Spanish Football Federation and La Liga have handled the racial abuse incident involving Real Madrid star Vinicius, while 31% remain dissatisfied.

Racism in Football

Respondents were asked whether they agreed with FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s statement that individuals with racist behavior should be excluded from the football community. In response, 50% of the participants expressed a neutral stance, 44% agreed with the statement, and 5% completely disagreed.

Defendant’s Letter of Apology

Vinicius joined La Liga, Real Madrid, and RFEF in bringing the case to court, where the defendants read a letter of apology during the hearing. In light of this, 58% of respondents believe the defendant’s letter of apology was a genuine act of remorse, and 42% believe otherwise.

The Future of Football

Finally, the survey on three people being sentenced for the racial abuse of Real Madrid star Vinicius revealed that 69% of respondents believe this conviction will lead to more rigorous actions against racism in football in the future, and 31% do not think so.

The post 82% Back Sentencing for Fans in Vinicius Jr. Racial Abuse Case appeared first on Survey Results & Insights - Real Research Media.